Reviewed by the CoveragePrep editorial team · Sources: state insurance departments, statutes, exam candidate handbooks · How we research

Practice test · 25 questions

Claims Handling and Adjuster Ethics Practice Test (Part 2 of 2)

Part 2 continues the claims handling and adjuster ethics question bank with 25 new questions. Answer each one to see the correct choice and a full explanation; your progress is saved in this browser.

Questions
25
Suggested time
30 min
Difficulty mix
5 / 14 / 6
Passing target
70%

Subtopics in this part: Subrogation, Salvage, Other insurance and contribution, Mortgage clause payments, Fraud and SIU, Unfair claims practices, Good faith and bad faith, Professional conduct, Privacy and identity disclosure.

0 of 25 answered
Subrogation · Challenging

Under NAIC Model Regulation 902, Aisha's covered collision loss is $8,000. Her insurer pays $7,000 after her $1,000 deductible, then recovers $6,000 (75% of the loss) from the at-fault driver's insurer without using an outside attorney. How much of the recovery should go to Aisha?

Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. $750

Model 902 Section 8D says subrogation recoveries are shared on a proportionate basis with the first-party claimant unless the deductible was otherwise recovered, with no expense deduction unless outside counsel was retained. Aisha bore $1,000 of the $8,000 loss (12.5%), so she receives 12.5% of $6,000, or $750, and the insurer keeps $5,250. Returning her full deductible would ignore the 25% shortfall.

Reference: NAIC Model 902, Section 8D

Salvage · Application

Under a Personal Auto Policy, an insured's car is a total loss with an actual cash value of $16,000, and the collision deductible is $500. The insurer pays the claim, takes the vehicle, and sells the salvage for $2,800. Ignoring towing and storage, what is the insurer's net cost?

Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: C. $12,700

The insurer pays actual cash value less the deductible: $16,000 - $500 = $15,500. Salvage is value recoverable after a loss, so the $2,800 sale proceeds reduce the insurer's net cost to $15,500 - $2,800 = $12,700. Subtracting salvage from the full $16,000 ($13,200) forgets that the insured, not the insurer, absorbed the $500 deductible.

Reference: ISO PP 00 01 09 18, Part D Limit Of Liability and Payment Of Loss; NAIC Glossary, Salvage

Other insurance and contribution · Application

A dwelling is insured under two policies written on HO 00 03 05 11: Policy A has a $240,000 Coverage A limit and Policy B has a $160,000 limit. A covered fire causes $50,000 of dwelling damage. Ignoring deductibles and assuming replacement cost requirements are met, how much does Policy A pay?

Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: A. $30,000

The HO-3 Other Insurance condition pays only the proportion of the loss that this policy's limit bears to the total insurance covering the loss. Total insurance is $240,000 + $160,000 = $400,000, so Policy A pays 60% of $50,000, or $30,000. Splitting the loss equally ($25,000) is the equal shares method, which this form does not use.

Reference: ISO HO 00 03 05 11, Section I Conditions, G. Other Insurance And Service Agreement

Other insurance and contribution · Challenging

Two primary CGL policies written on CG 00 01 04 13 cover the same $300,000 liability loss. Insurer X has a $100,000 limit, Insurer Y has a $500,000 limit, and both policies permit contribution by equal shares. How much does Insurer Y pay?

Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: D. $200,000

Under the CGL Method of Sharing, when all policies permit contribution by equal shares, each insurer pays equal amounts until it reaches its limit or the loss is fully paid. X and Y each pay $100,000; X is then exhausted, and Y pays the remaining $100,000, for $200,000 total. Contribution by limits ($500,000 / $600,000 of the loss) would have produced $250,000.

Reference: ISO CG 00 01 04 13, Section IV Conditions, 4.c Method Of Sharing

Mortgage clause payments · Recall

Under HO 00 03 05 11, a fire causes $42,000 of covered damage to Mei's dwelling. Cedar Ridge Lending is named in the policy as mortgagee. How should the adjuster issue the Coverage A payment?

Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Payable jointly to Mei and Cedar Ridge Lending, as interests appear

The HO-3 Mortgage Clause says that if a mortgagee is named in the policy, any loss payable under Coverage A or B is paid to the mortgagee and the insured, as interests appear. Naming both on the draft protects the lender's security interest in the dwelling. If more than one mortgagee is named, payment follows the order of precedence of the mortgages.

Reference: ISO HO 00 03 05 11, Section I Conditions, L. Mortgage Clause

Mortgage clause payments · Challenging

Under HO 00 03 05 11, the insurer denies Tom's dwelling fire claim after proving he intentionally set the fire. His mortgagee had no part in it. Which statement about the mortgagee's claim is correct?

Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: A. The denial does not defeat the mortgagee's valid claim if it meets the clause's conditions

The Mortgage Clause makes a denial of the insured's claim inapplicable to a valid mortgagee claim if the mortgagee reports known changes in ownership, occupancy, or substantial risk, pays premium on demand if the insured has not, and submits a signed, sworn statement of loss within 60 days after notice of the insured's failure to do so. If the insurer pays the mortgagee, it is subrogated to the mortgagee's rights.

Reference: ISO HO 00 03 05 11, Section I Conditions, L. Mortgage Clause, paragraphs 2 and 4

Fraud and SIU · Application

An adjuster inspects a house destroyed by fire. Which observation does the National Insurance Crime Bureau (NICB) list as a possible indicator that the fire was planned to collect insurance?

Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: C. No remains of family photos or other keepsakes are found

NICB lists the absence of sentimental items, such as family photos and trophies, as an indicator that property may have been removed before a planned arson and then claimed as lost. Other NICB scene indicators include missing remains of expensive or non-combustible items and fire alarms or sprinklers that failed to work. Working alarms, long ownership, and a cooking fire do not point to fraud.

Reference: NICB, Scene Indicators for Law Enforcement, Structure Fires

Fraud and SIU · Application

On a large burglary claim, an adjuster notes that the family was away on its first trip in years when the loss occurred, and many claimed items seem out of line with the household's income. What is the most appropriate next step?

Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: D. Refer the file to the special investigation unit (SIU)

NICB stresses that indicators only suggest the potential for fraud and are not evidence; follow-up investigation is required. Referral to the SIU, the insurer's fraud investigators recognized as an antifraud initiative in Model 680 Section 11, is the right step. Denying without a reasonable investigation would violate Model 900 Section 4F, and paying while ignoring the indicators skips the insurer's duty to investigate.

Reference: NICB, Scene Indicators for Law Enforcement (Property Fraud); NAIC Model 680, Section 11; NAIC Model 900, Section 4F

Fraud and SIU · Recall

Under the NAIC Insurance Fraud Prevention Model Act (Model 680), a person engaged in the business of insurance who knows or reasonably believes a fraudulent insurance act has been committed must provide that information to whom?

Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. The insurance commissioner, as the commissioner prescribes

Model 680 Section 6A requires anyone engaged in the business of insurance who knows or reasonably believes a fraudulent insurance act is being, will be, or has been committed to provide the information to the commissioner as the commissioner prescribes. Section 7 grants civil immunity for such reports unless they are made with actual malice. The NAIC does not prosecute fraud cases.

Reference: NAIC Insurance Fraud Prevention Model Act (Model 680), Sections 6 and 7

Fraud and SIU · Challenging

Under NAIC Model Regulation 902, an insurer has specific information, available for regulators to review, giving a reasonable basis to suspect that the insured set the fire that caused the loss. How does this affect the 21-day deadline to accept or deny after receiving the proof of loss?

Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: A. The deadline is lifted, but a decision is due within a reasonable time

Model 902 Sections 7A and 7B normally require accepting or denying within 21 days after properly executed proofs of loss, or a written explanation and 45-day status letters. When specific information available for regulators' review gives a reasonable basis to suspect the claimant fraudulently caused or contributed to the loss, the insurer is relieved of those time limits but must still decide within a reasonable time for full investigation.

Reference: NAIC Model 902, Sections 7A and 7B

Unfair claims practices · Application

Under the NAIC Unfair Claims Settlement Practices Act (Model 900), an act listed as an unfair claims practice becomes an improper claims practice when the insurer commits it:

Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: D. Flagrantly, or often enough to indicate a general business practice

Model 900 Section 3 makes an act listed in Section 4 an improper claims practice only if it is committed flagrantly and in conscious disregard of the Act, or with such frequency as to indicate a general business practice. A single honest mistake usually does not qualify. The Act is enforced by the commissioner through hearings and orders, not by a court's bad faith finding.

Reference: NAIC Unfair Claims Settlement Practices Act (Model 900), Section 3

Unfair claims practices · Application

Which statement about the NAIC Unfair Claims Settlement Practices Act (Model 900) is accurate?

Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: C. It is enforced by the commissioner and creates no private cause of action

Section 1 of Model 900 states that nothing in the Act creates or implies a private cause of action; enforcement runs through the commissioner, who may issue cease and desist orders, penalties, and license actions. The Act's definition of insurer includes agents, brokers, adjusters, and third party administrators, so adjusters are covered. Workers compensation, fidelity, suretyship, and boiler and machinery claims are excluded.

Reference: NAIC Model 900, Sections 1, 2C and 6

Unfair claims practices · Application

After a covered fire makes the Nguyen family's home unlivable, the adjuster discusses only the dwelling and contents coverages and never mentions the policy's Coverage D (Loss Of Use), hoping the family will not claim it. Under NAIC Model Regulation 902, this conduct is best described as:

Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Failing to fully disclose pertinent benefits and coverages to a first-party claimant

Model 902 Section 5A says no insurer shall fail to fully disclose to first-party claimants all pertinent benefits, coverages, or other provisions under which a claim is presented, and Section 5B bars agents from concealing them. Coverage D (Loss Of Use) is plainly pertinent when the home is unlivable. Model 900 Section 4A separately prohibits knowingly misrepresenting relevant facts or policy provisions.

Reference: NAIC Model 902, Sections 5A and 5B; NAIC Model 900, Section 4A

Unfair claims practices · Application

A claims supervisor tells an adjuster to deny a new water damage claim because the insured had a prior water claim, without inspecting the home or determining the cause of the new loss. Under NAIC Model 900, this approach most directly risks which unfair claims practice?

Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: A. Refusing to pay claims without conducting a reasonable investigation

Model 900 Section 4F lists refusing to pay claims without conducting a reasonable investigation. A prior water claim says nothing about the cause or coverage of this loss; the adjuster must inspect and investigate before deciding. A pattern of such denials could also show a failure to adopt reasonable investigation standards under Section 4C. The other options describe listed practices that do not fit these facts.

Reference: NAIC Model 900, Sections 4C and 4F

Unfair claims practices · Application

Under the NAIC Unfair Claims Settlement Practices Act (Model 900), each of the following is listed as an unfair claims practice EXCEPT:

Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: D. Requesting a signed, sworn proof of loss when the policy requires one

Model 900 lists compelling insureds to sue through low offers (4E), failing to adopt reasonable standards (4C), and failing to affirm or deny within a reasonable time after investigation (4G). Requesting a signed, sworn proof of loss that the policy requires is a normal insurer right. Section 4K targets only unreasonable delay caused by requiring a proof of loss plus duplicative verification.

Reference: NAIC Model 900, Section 4

Unfair claims practices · Application

An insurer agrees that most items in a burglary claim are covered but is still reviewing several jewelry items. It issues a $6,200 draft for the undisputed items. Under NAIC Model Regulation 902, which notation on the draft or cover letter would be improper?

Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: C. Final payment and full release of all claims

Model 902 Section 5E bars stating that a payment is final or a release unless the policy limit has been paid or a compromise on coverage and amount was agreed, and Section 5F bars partial-settlement drafts that purport to release total liability. Identifying the coverage under which payment is made is proper; Model 900 Section 4J lists failing to do so as an unfair practice.

Reference: NAIC Model 902, Sections 5E and 5F; NAIC Model 900, Section 4J

Unfair claims practices · Recall

Under NAIC Model Regulation 902, an insurer negotiating directly with an unrepresented third-party claimant whose rights may be affected by a statute of limitations must give written notice of the limitation at least how many days before it expires?

Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: A. 60 days

Model 902 Section 7D bars continuing direct settlement negotiations with an unrepresented claimant whose rights may be affected by a statute of limitations unless written notice of the limitation is given: at least 60 days before expiration for third-party claimants and at least 30 days for first-party claimants. The 30-day figure is the tempting wrong answer because it applies to first-party claimants.

Reference: NAIC Model 902, Section 7D

Unfair claims practices · Challenging

A dead tree on a neighbor's lot falls on Rosa's detached garage. Rosa's homeowners policy covers the damage, but her adjuster says the claim will be held until the neighbor's liability insurer decides whether to pay. Under NAIC Model Regulation 902, this is:

Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Improper, because her own insurer may not wait for another party to pay

Model 902 Section 7C says insurers shall not fail to settle first-party claims on the basis that responsibility for payment should be assumed by others, except as the policy provides. Rosa's own policy covers the loss, so her insurer should pay her and then pursue the neighbor through subrogation if warranted. Sending 45-day status letters does not cure an improper basis for delay.

Reference: NAIC Model 902, Section 7C

Good faith and bad faith · Application

Which of the following situations describes third-party bad faith rather than first-party bad faith?

Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: D. An insurer refuses a reasonable demand within its insured's liability limits

Third-party bad faith arises under liability coverage, when an insurer handling a claim made against its insured unreasonably fails to settle within limits and the insured is hit with a judgment above the limits. California's CACI 2334, for example, lets the insured recover the entire judgment. The other choices are first-party bad faith: mistreating the insured's own claim for the insured's own loss.

Reference: Judicial Council of California, CACI No. 2334, Bad Faith (Third Party), Refusal to Accept Reasonable Settlement

Good faith and bad faith · Challenging

Jordan's auto policy has a $50,000 bodily injury limit per person. Jordan clearly caused a crash that left another driver with injuries likely worth well over $200,000. The injured driver's attorney offers to settle for $50,000. What is the adjuster's best course of action?

Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: C. Promptly evaluate the demand and recommend accepting it

Model 900 Section 4D requires good faith efforts at prompt, fair settlement once liability is reasonably clear. Here liability is clear and damages far exceed the $50,000 limit, so a demand within limits should be promptly evaluated and normally accepted. Unreasonably rejecting it can expose the insurer to the entire excess judgment in a third-party bad faith claim, and the insured should be kept informed.

Reference: NAIC Model 900, Section 4D; CACI No. 2334

Professional conduct · Application

During a property claim, an insured asks the adjuster whether she should hire a lawyer and whether she has a strong case against her home builder. Under standard adjuster codes of ethics, what is the most appropriate response?

Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: A. Say she may consult an attorney of her choice, without giving legal advice about her case

Adjuster codes of ethics, such as Fla. Admin. Code 69B-220.201(3)(h) and La. R.S. 22:1674.1(A)(16), forbid advising a claimant to refrain from seeking legal advice or against retaining counsel. Evaluating the strength of a lawsuit is legal advice, which an adjuster who is not an attorney should not give because it risks the unauthorized practice of law. The right answer respects her freedom to consult a lawyer.

Reference: Fla. Admin. Code 69B-220.201(3)(h); La. R.S. 22:1674.1(A)(16)

Professional conduct · Recall

An adjuster handling a liability claim knows the injured third-party claimant has hired an attorney. The claimant then calls the adjuster directly to discuss a settlement figure. Under typical state adjuster codes of ethics, the adjuster should:

Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Not negotiate or settle directly with the claimant unless the attorney consents

State codes such as Fla. Admin. Code 69B-220.201(3)(g) and La. R.S. 22:1674.1(A)(14) bar adjusters from negotiating or effecting settlement directly with a third-party claimant known to be represented by an attorney, unless the attorney consents. It does not matter who started the call. The adjuster can ask the claimant to have the attorney make contact. Urging the claimant to drop counsel is also improper.

Reference: Fla. Admin. Code 69B-220.201(3)(g); La. R.S. 22:1674.1(A)(14)

Professional conduct · Recall

A roofing contractor offers an independent adjuster a $500 gift card for each insured the adjuster refers to the contractor. Under typical state adjuster standards of conduct, the adjuster should:

Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: D. Decline, because paid referrals to contractors are prohibited

Standards such as La. R.S. 22:1674.1 bar adjusters from having a financial interest in a claim beyond their agreed pay, from soliciting work for contractors, and from accepting compensation from contractors engaged by insureds. Florida's code likewise bars steering claimants to anyone who will compensate the adjuster for the referral. Reasonable prices or disclosure on request do not cure the conflict of interest.

Reference: La. R.S. 22:1674.1(A)(1), (3) and (4); Fla. Admin. Code 69B-220.201(3)(a)

Privacy and identity disclosure · Application

To learn whether an injured claimant is really disabled, an adjuster calls the claimant's neighbor, poses as a survey taker, and does not reveal her identity. Under the NAIC Insurance Information and Privacy Protection Model Act (Model 670), this is a:

Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: C. Pretext interview, generally prohibited unless a narrow claim exception for suspected fraud applies

Model 670 defines a pretext interview as one in which a person pretends to be someone else, misrepresents the interview's purpose, or refuses to identify himself or herself on request. Section 3 prohibits pretext interviews, with a narrow claim exception where specific information gives a reasonable basis to suspect criminal activity, fraud, or material misrepresentation. Adjusters should normally identify themselves and whom they represent.

Reference: NAIC Insurance Information and Privacy Protection Model Act (Model 670), Sections 2V and 3

Privacy and identity disclosure · Application

A reporter calls an adjuster asking for details of a local official's injury claim, including medical information. Under the NAIC Insurance Information and Privacy Protection Model Act (Model 670), the adjuster generally should:

Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Decline without the individual's written authorization or an exception

Model 670 Section 13 bars insurers, agents, and insurance support organizations from disclosing personal or privileged information collected in connection with an insurance transaction unless the individual gives written authorization or a listed exception applies, such as disclosures needed to perform an insurance function or to detect fraud. Claim-related details are privileged information. A reporter's request fits no exception, and payment of the claim changes nothing.

Reference: NAIC Model 670, Sections 2W and 13

How to use this practice test

Pick an answer and the correct choice appears with an explanation and the policy form, statute or FEMA document it comes from. Difficulty is labeled on each question: recall items test a definition, application items put the rule into a short claim scenario, and challenging items combine two rules or require a calculation.

Aim for at least 80% before moving on, since the real exam mixes these topics with state law under time pressure. When you are consistently above that line, take a full timed exam or the version for your state: Texas or Florida 6-20.

Keep practicing

More claims handling and adjuster ethics questions

Timed practice exams

Texas All-Lines Adjuster150 questions · 150 minutes · weighted like the real outlineFlorida 6-20 All-Lines Adjuster110 questions · 120 minutes · weighted like the real outlineClaims Adjuster (Property and Casualty)100 questions · 120 minutes · weighted like the real outlineAlaska Independent Adjuster80 questions · 90 minutes · weighted like the real outlineAlabama Independent Adjuster150 questions · 180 minutes · weighted like the real outlineArkansas Adjuster75 questions · 270 minutes · weighted like the real outlineArizona Adjuster150 questions · 150 minutes · weighted like the real outlineCalifornia Insurance Adjuster100 questions · 150 minutes · weighted like the real outlineConnecticut All Lines Casualty Adjuster100 questions · 120 minutes · weighted like the real outlineDelaware Property Adjuster50 questions · 75 minutes · weighted like the real outlineGeorgia Adjuster100 questions · 120 minutes · weighted like the real outlineHawaii Adjuster80 questions · 105 minutes · weighted like the real outlineIowa Independent Adjuster50 questions · 60 minutes · weighted like the real outlineIdaho Independent Adjuster50 questions · 75 minutes · weighted like the real outlineIndiana Independent Adjuster100 questions · 105 minutes · weighted like the real outlineKentucky Adjuster50 questions · 60 minutes · weighted like the real outlineLouisiana Property and Casualty Adjuster150 questions · 160 minutes · weighted like the real outlineMaine Property and Casualty Adjuster50 questions · 60 minutes · weighted like the real outlineMichigan Independent Adjuster100 questions · 120 minutes · weighted like the real outlineMinnesota Property and Casualty Adjuster35 questions · 60 minutes · weighted like the real outlineMississippi Independent Adjuster60 questions · 120 minutes · weighted like the real outlineMontana Multi-Line Adjuster88 questions · 105 minutes · weighted like the real outlineNorth Carolina Adjuster100 questions · 135 minutes · weighted like the real outlineNew Mexico Adjuster50 questions · 60 minutes · weighted like the real outlineNew York Independent General Adjuster100 questions · 120 minutes · weighted like the real outlineOklahoma Property and Casualty Adjuster85 questions · 135 minutes · weighted like the real outlineOregon General Lines Adjuster150 questions · 150 minutes · weighted like the real outlineSouth Carolina Property, Casualty, Surety and Marine Adjuster100 questions · 120 minutes · weighted like the real outlineUtah Adjuster150 questions · 150 minutes · weighted like the real outlineWashington Adjuster100 questions · 135 minutes · weighted like the real outlineWest Virginia Adjuster75 questions · 90 minutes · weighted like the real outlineWyoming Property and Casualty Adjuster100 questions · 120 minutes · weighted like the real outline

Other topics